I cannot help the fact that Fr. Ivo and possibly others do not know the meaning of the term "gratuitous flame-bait". I would advise them to consult a dictionary, and read the rules of Goanet and other such internet discussion forums. But let me point out the fabrications that Fr. Ivo has posted on Goanet in my name, out of the blue, under a new thread entitled "Science-Religion Dialogue", without having been provoked by me recently in that forum. In case of partial fabrications, I quote only the fabricated parts. In one, the fabrication is the fact that it was Fr. Ivo who stated this notion, and I was arguing against it.
"Survival beyond death is important because science has to validate the Christian doctrine of resurrection". ......Fr. Ivo "God is not real." ......Fr. Ivo "Science explains .... meaning of life." ......Fr. Ivo "Man is a bundle of neurons." ......Fr. Ivo Cheers, Santosh 2010/12/12 Ivo <[email protected]>: - Hide quoted text - > > > From: Santosh Helekar >>>I would like to kindly request Fr. Ivo Souza, Gilbert Lawrence and > Roland Francis to not involve my name in their gratuitous flame baits > and fabrications on Goanet. > <<Fr. Ivo wrote: > P.S.: I am sure that Rachol will not produce rubbish crap ( or > "breakthroughs") of Santoshian trademark in the name of "scientific > literacy", > as it is found on this Forum, in the form of following statements: > 1.Evolution excludes God (Darwinism, Big Bang Theories exclude God). > Evolution and Creation are incompatible. > 2. Human consciousness can be explained totally in purely chemical terms. > Man is a bundle of neurons. Brain activity explains consciousness. Science > excludes any concept of "spiritual element" (soul or psyche) > 3. Science explains adequately the origin and meaning of life... (I quoted > 32 Santoshian "scientific" statements) > > **I would like to know how are these statements "gratuitous flame baits and > fabrications on Goanet". > Either Santosh does not know what he writes or does not understand what he > reads. Why is he accusing me > of maligning him when I am quoting his "gem" statements, coming from a > neuroscientist? > I hope Santosh will have an introspection into how much harm he is doing to > the Goanet readers, in spite of his collossal knowledge of Science... > Regards. > Fr.Ivo >
