I understand the diatribe against Uday Bhembro. But I have a hard time making sense of the contradictory claims made in the post appended below:
1. Does Goa Su-Raj party want to establish the pre-1961 dictatorial administration or continue with a democratic one? 2. Does it want Goa to secede from India and become independent or remain part of India? 3. Why would Goans who consider themselves Indian want to vote for Goa Su-Raj party, considering its founder does not consider himself an Indian? 4. If Portuguese are the worst of them all, wouldn't Indians be better than them? Cheers, Santosh --- In [email protected], "floriano" <floriano.lobo@...> wrote: > >This has made me say that 'WE DO NOT WANT THE PORTUGUESE BACK, BUT WE >WANT >THE PORTUGUESE ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM (RULE) BACK. > ..................................................... > > 5. I proudly say that I am a GOAN, not Portuguese, and definitely not >INDIAN. > ...................................................... > >The Portuguese are the worst of them all. > ....................................................... > > 6. My chief ambition in the formation of GOA SU-RAJ PARTY is to use the >democratic set-up that India has promoted in Goa (however vile it may be) >to >throw these unwanted and despicable High commands from Delhi, Nagpur >and >Maharashtra out of Goa once and for all and along with them Adv. Uday >Bhembre >and all other traitors of GOA , the New Delhi's main GOAN >(CONGRESS) >chamchas, for sure. If the Independence for Goa is not >possible, then I shall >vigorously fight for SPECIAL STATUS for Goa, that >which has been promised by >various high ranking 'charlatans' and which is >still a distant dream. >
