Roland, These figures are as obviously stated by politicians during the elections. As we all know, under-declaring is a chronic problem. If you click on each name, you will get details about their acknowledged assets and the worth of each.
But what is the use of merely taking pot shots in very general terms over cyberspace? It would make a lot of sense if some citizens' panel had undertaken a detailed analysis of each claim, and showed up the obvious loopholes. The values of some apartments claimed is laughable. At the same time, a politician owning crores in properties was named by the Congress to decide land ceilings in Goa (which tenancy was speedily decided, and applied very inconsistently across Goa in the 1960s, this, not surprisingly, never got done!) FN On 7 May 2011 04:51, Roland Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > A hilarious Mickey Mouse list if I ever saw one! > > For assets multiply each figure about 50 to 60 times and for criminal cases > multiply by 25 to arrive at "felonies committed". > > That will bring it closer to the truth. > > If you include another column "Swiss Bank Accounts" there would be more red > figures against each of the 40 Thieves.
