Antonio, That is not the point. It's unfair to abuse Parrikar or Bhembre's (or anyone else's) ancestors, just as it is incorrect for PB and Co to debate on the basis of Alemao's lack of formal education.
The question is whose position is more realistic at this point of time, what do the parents prefer (and why!), what would be in the long term interest of the children, and while English is despicable at the primary level of education but perfectly fine at the middle/secondary/higher secondary and univ levels! To push an argument on the basis that the other side lacks in formal education isn't very convincing, to say the least. FN On 26 June 2011 12:59, Antonio Menezes <[email protected]> wrote: > Uday Bhembre ( T.O.I. pg.5, June 26 ) states: ''' It is unfortunate that > our Chief Minister is being misled > by an uneducated man like .....''' > > Manohar Parrikar ( Herald pg.10 , June 26 ) : ''' He has diverted from > fishing to education ''' > > A question to Parrikar and Bhembre: What right do you both have to speak > in this way, when your own > '''glorious ''' ancestors gave India an equally ''' glorious history ''' > of 2 thousand years before 1947 ?
