[1] Frederick FN Noronha wrote: Aires, do you have a comment on this case, since you had made a lot of statements over it and then suddenly lapsed into silence?
[2]TARGET GOA [Sept 16, 2010] - This is the latest reference (to this case) I could find on this site. The mother then said her daughter was under considerable stress and tension due to the PUBLICITY surrounding the case. http://www.targetgoa.com/newsd.php?id=1073 I am sure there is an update - unless the 'ferry boat late became'. [3] loads of posts/views available on goanet archives esp Oct 2008 http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2008-October/date.html The following snippets from Oct 2008 are self-explanatory jc [4] FF 6: It is only when Rohit surrenders that the girl and the mother will be forced to do, what must be done, in proving that Rohit is guilty JC 6: I respectfully disagree with this premise of yours. Please read the Goa Children's Act 2003. s32. Procedure of the Children's Court ss(1)(l) Burden of Proof http://www.colaco.net/1/gca2003.htm (half way down the page) [5] Whether or not the young girl has really been violated (as is alleged), her privacy has IMHO most definitely been violated by those who have disclosed her mother's name to the press. This could NOT have been for the sake of the child's interests.
