It looks like religious extremists of all three kinds, namely Hindu, Christian and Muslim subscribe to the same world view and predisposition against each other.
Cheers, Santosh --- On Tue, 7/26/11, Gerald Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote: > Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 11:29 AM > The Norwegian killer of innocents > lionises Hindu right wing activities against Muslims. > July 26, 2011 > The Catholic-Christian Secular Forum (CSF) strongly > protests and condemns the Norwegian killings of innocent and > injuries to many by Anders Behring, now come to be known for > his anti-Islamic views. He must be punished with the maximum > punishment possible under the law. Here below is how Anders > Breivik claims the goals of Indian Hindu nationalists were > identical to Justiciar Knights, which needs to be condemned > by all secular-minded civil society citizens. > > Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik hailed > India’s Hindu nationalist movement as a key ally in a > global struggle to bring down democratic regimes across the > world. ‘2080: A European declaration of independence’ > lays out a road map for a future organisation, the Justiciar > Knights, to wage a campaign that will graduate from acts of > terrorism to a global war involving weapons of mass > destruction — aimed at bringing down what Breivik calls > the “cultural Marxist” order. India figures in a > remarkable 102 pages of the sprawling 1,518-page manifesto. > Breivik’s manifesto says his Justiciar Knights “support > the Sanatana Dharma movements and Indian nationalists in > general.” In section 3.158 of the manifesto, he explains > that Hindu nationalists “are suffering from the same > persecution by the Indian cultural Marxists as their > European cousins.” > Appeasing Muslims > The United Progressive Alliance government, he goes on, > “relies on appeasing Muslims and, very sadly, > proselytising Christian missionaries who illegally convert > low caste Hindus with lies and fear, alongside Communists > who want total destruction of the Hindu faith and > culture.” Even though Hindus who are living abroad “get > an eagle’s view of what’s happening in India, Indian > Hindu residents don’t see it being in the scene.” > Breivik’s manifesto applauds Hindu groups who “do not > tolerate the current injustice and often riot and attack > Muslims when things get out of control,” but says, “this > behaviour is nonetheless counterproductive.” “Instead of > attacking the Muslims, they should target the category A and > B traitors in India and consolidate military cells and > actively seek the overthrow of the cultural Marxist > government.” “It is essential that the European and > Indian resistance movements learn from each other and > cooperate > as much as possible,” he concludes. “Our goals are > more or less identical.” > Lists Hindutva Websites > Breivik lists the websites of the Bharatiya Janata Party, > the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the National Volunteers’ > Organisation, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad and the > Vishwa Hindu Parishad as resources for further information. > The manifesto pledges military support “to the > nationalists in the Indian civil war and in the deportation > of all Muslims from India.” This is part of a larger > campaign to “overthrow of all western European > multiculturalist governments” and evict “U.S. military > personnel on European soil.” India is one of several > countries — including Russia, the Philippines, China and > Thailand — where Breivik hopes his successors will fight. > He uses the work of historians K.S. Lal and Shrinandan Vyas > to point to the threat posed by Islam to Europe, saying > their work has established that millions of Hindus were > killed in a genocide during 1000-1525 AD. N.S. Rajaram, > another historian, is quoted as saying India’s > “political class have been so debilitating that they > continue to live in a state of constant fear.” Breivik’s > manifesto envisages that this future organisation would hand > out a “multi-cultural force medal,” which would be > awarded for “military cooperation with nationalist Hindu, > Buddhist, Jewish and/or atheist forces (non-European) on > Hindu, Buddhist or Jewish territory. These efforts must be > directed against Jihadi or cultural Marxist forces, > personnel or interests.” > The medals would include a “Liberation of India Service > Medal,” which would be awarded for “assisting Indian > nationalist forces to drive out Islam from Indian > territory.” Breivik’s Indian-made combat badges, > revealed by The Hindu as having been contracted to a > workshop in Varanasi, were the first in this series of > battle decorations. His manifesto acknowledges that lives > will be lost in the war, and calls for the organisation to > “provide and subsidise a standard edition of the Justiciar > Knight tombstone” for those who fell in battle. Since a > “European tombstone carver, preferably specialised in > traditional tombstone architecture, is likely to charge more > than 5000-10000 Euro in order to create the stone,” > Breivik suggested that “producers in low-cost countries > should be contacted for the task of creating one or multiple > stones in the future.” > He acknowledged that this “might sound hypocritical > considering the fact that cultural conservatives in general > oppose Indian or Chinese membership in [the] WTO and the > fact that we generally prefer in-sourcing as many industries > as possible. However, conserving our funds is a central part > of our struggle.” Even though Breivik’s Knights would > fight shoulder to shoulder with Hindu nationalists, his > vision for their rights in a post-revolutionary Europe is > limited. The manifesto envisages the creation of a > “servant class,” made up of non-Muslim individuals from > Bangladesh, Pakistan and India. “During their stay,” the > manifesto envisages, “they will work 12 hours a day for > the duration of their contracts (6 or 12 months) and are > then flown back to their homelands.” “These > individuals,” it goes on, “will live in segregated > communities in pre-defined areas of each major city.” >
