TALK ABOUT TALKS
There has been considerable interest generated with the on going talks
with our neigbhour These talks as confidence building measures have
led to no where to address the problems of terrorism In fact it is
almost a ritual in high places, including the schedule and unscheduled
meetings  even with the Prime Ministers  and Foreign Secretaries of
the respective countries The belief in this diplomacy including games
invitation are only for public consumption as there is no thaw in the
relations of giving up known rigid stands The argument that each ones
positions are better understood  is hollow.The war of Kargil., attack
on the Parliament, 26/11 and now 13/11, the train blasts and countless
terrorists blasts are all sandwiched between the talks at all levels
,intermittently The Kasmiri  separatists are given a free reign to
malign the country and carry on subversive activities with impunity
The talks are forced on both indirectly by foreign powers to satisfy
their agenda of intervention. After 26/11 the Govt of India declared
position  was of not engaging with Pakistan unless the perpetrators of
26/11 are brought to book. Pakistant in all instances tries to water
down our reports  our requests, so that the evidence is brought to a
naught. The present talks with the new foreign Minister was a stage
show to launch her in her diplomatic debut, and not substantial at
all. In fact the first meeting by her with the separatist has been
disapproved ,if not condemned out right, so as not to derail the
engagement The acquisition of nuclear capability and arms shopping of
sophisticated weaponry is directed towards India , which the country
can ill afford considering its state of economy It is also a tactic to
force India to spend our resources on arms and  on non productive
sector, Pakistan is constantly engaged in low intensity war through
the terrorist and home grown dissenters ,bleeding the country of its
development.
Pakistan has provoked 3 full scale wars on India besides the
misadventure of Kargil India like a big brother showed its magnanimity
also under foreign pressure to return the war gains The 90,000
P.O.W.in Bangladesh  war were released without striking a bargain.
Then why did India incur loss of material and human resources . in
fighting wars and repulsing the enemy at a heavy cost? Pakistan cannot
be trusted at all at the  face value and in the light of past
experiences. The army in Pakistan indirectly is at the helm of affairs
feeding on with perpetual animosity against INDIA. The terror camps in
Pakistan are directed towards destabilizing India and have not been
dismantled in spite of proof
 The cultural exchanges ,trade and commerce, people to people movement
and all civilian exercises do not in any way alter the reality of
their tirade against India and its citizens The talks are always
related and linked to Kashmir  and  not to POK. Why does Pakistan not
put into operation their avowed right of self determination .,freedom,
first in P.O.K to serve as a model.?  Indian stand is not consistent
and is wavering and the neigbhour  finds it convenient to engage in
mere rhetoric during talks. If the talks have not produced the desired
outcome and there is no possibility of attaining goals the baby talks
must be suspended unless specific issues can be achieved by such
engagements
Nelson Lopes Chinchinim 9850926276

Reply via email to