COLONIAL HISTORY, POST-COLONIAL INTERPRETATIONS

By

DALE LUIS MENEZES

Teotonio R. de Souza is an authority on Indo-Portuguese history.  The doctoral 
dissertation he had submitted to the University of Poona was published in 1979 
as Medieval Goa: A Socio-Economic History.  Thirty years later, a second 
edition of the book was published thereby displaying its usefulness and 
academic merit. This text was widely distributed and read. It sought to “…get 
closer to the common man’s reality [and]…replace the myth of a ‘Golden Goa’”. 
There was such a need because, “During colonial times, Portuguese studies were 
concentrated largely on the history of navigation and expansion of Christianity 
by the Portuguese in the East. They do merit attention and their long-term 
consequences can hardly be ignored. However, following the end of colonial era, 
it was necessary to maintain the historiographic balance and to question the 
exaggerated myths about the ‘Discoveries’ and ‘Civilizing Mission’ of Portugal, 
and the playing down of, or ignoring, the harmful consequences that accompanied 
and followed those feats and mentality.”
        
I had read this book a few months ago and had always hesitated to write a 
review because I feared that I might not be able to evaluate the book properly. 
But as a student of history I have tried to read whatever Dr. de Souza has 
written. This review is written mustering much courage and much effort to 
marshal my thoughts in the right direction.
        
Medieval Goa focuses mainly on the ordinary people of the urban areas and the 
country side, which included native as well as Portuguese commoners who had 
suffered and were victimized by the policies and excesses of colonialism. Dr. 
de Souza’s work marks the first formal and best known effort in Goa to write 
histories that are not dynastic in nature and by including the race and caste 
relations of the rulers and the natives Dr. de Souza has moved away from the 
Nationalist paradigm of giving us conflict-free and sanitized accounts of the 
past. Just as the noted historian of Ancient Indian history, Romila Thapar has 
credited the writings of the Marxist historian D. D. Kosambi as a watershed 
moment in Indian history writing, Dr. de Souza’s work can also be termed as a 
watershed moment in the history writing of Goa.
        
The influence of Marxism on the work of Dr. de Souza can also be observed in 
the pages of this book. Shifting the focus from the (suspected) greatness of 
the rulers of the past to the socio-economic conditions is a major Marxist 
contribution to Indian historiography. Besides, Dr. de Souza also uses words 
like ‘Praxis’ which brings to mind the Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci who 
reinterpreted Marx and his ideas and who was jailed during the fascist regime 
of Mussolini referring to Marxism in his prison notebooks as ‘philosophy of 
praxis’ to escape the prison censors. Praxis means a set of examples for 
practice.
        
A major contribution of this book is the recognition that native elements had 
actively collaborated in the empire-building activity of the Portuguese. I 
shall reproduce a few excerpts below: 
…when the Portuguese captured Goa, the success of the Portuguese was made 
possible by the native Hindu population which fought side by side with the 
Portuguese to defeat their former Muslim overlords (p. 6). 
After 1656, when the Bijapuris had to grapple with both the Mughals and the 
Marathas, they had no energy to spare for further conflict with the Portuguese. 
However, the latter was not free from embroilment in the politics of these 
powers since many of these provincial officials, the desais, had revolted 
against their masters and sought frequent refuge in the Portuguese territory. 
The Portuguese secretly favoured the guerilla movements of these desais to keep 
the powers concerned distracted with campaigns to bring the rebels to book (p. 
12).  

The Hindus in Goa were not just shopkeepers and tax-farmers. They were in every 
kind of trade and profession, and were much appreciated not only by their 
common clients but every religious and State official (p. 84).” 
        
Caste and racial prejudices seeping into the Christian realm in medieval Goa 
can be observed by the following excerpt, for many of us are generally of the 
naïve opinion that caste does not exist in Christianity: “Where social 
integration was concerned the Christian preaching of brotherhood and equality 
of all men did not prevent the missionaries from establishing religious 
confraternities (confrarias) based on castes: and, just as their doctrinal 
wealth failed to promote greater social cohesion, their vast income and 
unlimited political influence did not achieve proportionate results in raising 
the standard of living of their native converts. Even in admissions in their 
own ranks, religious orders, particularly the Jesuits, maintained strict racial 
qualifications during the period covered by this study.”
        
The work of Dr. de Souza by his own admission “left many loose ends than it has 
succeeded in tying up.” It threw up a lot of new questions for future students 
to dwell upon. How far these questions have been taken up as topics of research 
is in itself an important question to ask. Scouring the internet for scholarly 
material published in journals and other publications on Goa written by Goan 
academics returns minimal results. Because there are many loose ends, it gives 
us an opportunity to think about the past in many different ways and also to 
hear the many voices of history. Dr. de Souza’s work potentially can break an 
elitist narrative of the past that prevails amidst us and makes us see who 
benefits and why from a particular type of rendering of history. Dr. de Souza 
acknowledges his intellectual debt to D. D. Kosambi, who stopped us from 
treating the history of India and Goa “as an episode of colonial 
historiography” and that our history has a much more distant past and a 
promising future. This hope of a “promising future” is yet to materialize.
I would like to end by a cautionary quote from Dr. de Souza’s valuable work, 
“Willingness on the part of the native subjects to collaborate was not lacking, 
but this factor is being misinterpreted in the wake of Goa's liberation from 
colonialism, threatening thereby to continue the evils of colonialism and the 
exploitation of one section of population by another.”

Comments/feedback @ 
http://daleluismenezes.blogspot.com/2011/11/colonial-history-post-colonial.html

END OF ARTICLE

Medieval Goa: A Socio-Economic History, 2nd edn by Teotonio R de Souza 
(Saligão, Goa: Broadway Book Centre & Goa 1556), 2009; pp. xviii+265, Rs. 395/- 
[ISBN: 978-81-905682-6-5]
Web: goa1556.goa-india.org, www.flipkart.com



Find my writings @ www.daleluismenezes.blogspot.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Protect Goa's natural beauty

                    Support Goa's first Tiger Reserve

  Sign the petition at:     http://www.goanet.org/petition/petition.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to