28th Feb.2012

KEY POINTS MADE AT THE PRESS CONFERENCE BY SHRI SHANTARAM NAIK MP, Secretary AICC and Chief Spokespeson of Goa PCC

Mr Shantaram Naik M.P. ,Chief Spokesperson of Goa Pradesh Congress Committee said, while addressing a press conference at Congress House Panaji on Tuesday that Finance Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee did not say a word as regards special provisions under article 371 of the Constitution (popularly known as Special status), which is Goa’s basic demand, during his press conference in Panaji on Monday.

Mr Naik said that media asked questions regarding special status and Mr Mukherjee answered the same in the context of Special Category which is a separate demand of Goans under which by Executive Order States are included in the List of Special Category, which entitles them special grants, additional funds , special schemes etc.


There are 11 states which enjoy the status of Special Category, namely, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram, Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarachal.

Mr Mukerjee has that Central Government is meeting Goa’s demand of additional finances by way of separate packages etc and, at present National Advisory Council, which decides which states to be included in Special Category has decided not to include any more States in that category.

Goa’s key demand is for a Constitutional amendment under article 371 of the Constition of India to empower Goa Assembly , to enact a legislation ( which Goa Assembly cannot do without being empowered by Constitutional Amendment) to bring in restrictions on transfer of land and other immoveable properties on grounds of duration of residential requirement in the State, social and economic needs of the State, environment and public interest, as may be specified by the law.


Land is becoming a scarce commodity more particularly in smaller States. Land mafia from foreign countries are landing in States like Goa with tons of money buying huge areas creating social and economic chaos. Some of the parties are potential enough to buy a whole village in a smaller State like Goa, Mr Naik said .

Persons in real estate in the country too, are resorting to similar purchases disturbing the social fabric in the State, he added

Rights existing under the constitution should not be so unfettered so as to change economic scenario of a smaller State, particularly its villages, much to the disadvantage of the State and its people. Anti-social elements which become a part of such uncontrolled transactions are proving disastrous for a State like Goa, Mr Naik said.

The reason as to why we are insisting on a constitutional backing is that the State Assembly, had, in the year 2008, enacted a legislation to amend to Registration Act to authorize State Government to frame Rules, providing for issuing direction to the sub-registrars, to refuse registration of certain documents, declared by the government as being opposed to public policy.

President of India has refused to give assent to the bill of the Goa government which the Governor of Goa had reserved for the consideration of the President. A similar bill passed by the Assembly of another State ,it is learnt, was struck down by the Supreme Court.

It is , in these circumstances, that Goa has demanded amendment to article 371 of the Constitution so that in a few years time we do not come across a village called Russian Village or Israel Village in Goa.

But media did not ask a question on this aspect or rather media had in mind this very issue but t the Finance Minister took is as a demand to include Goa in Special Category which demand comes only next to Special Provision demand, Mr Naik said.

Mr Naik said that he has been time again mentioning in his press conferences that there is no provision for “special status” in the constitution , and that what it contains is special provisions under article 371. Some people call “ Special Category” as special status and, some refer to” special provision s under article 371” as special status.
VELIM INCIDENT

Mr Naik said that it was unbecoming of Goa police personnel to go and knock at the doors of the Parish Priest of Velim at 9 p.m , and therefore, police have to issue a clarifying statement on this incident.

Mr Naik said that even Chief Electoral Officer has said that the police have to explain their conduct.

Secondly, if the police are deemed to be on deputation to the Election Commission then the Commission has to direct the highest authority of Police in Goa to take appropriate action.

Mr Naik said that since Code of Conduct is in operation , Goa Government cannot take any action in this regard.

Mr Naik also questioned the action of the police and asked as to how an FIR could be lodged against the priest, when police themselves have stated that the priest was trying to pacify the crowd.

In fact , FIR is not such a sacrosanct document that a name which has been erroneously included without any basis cannot be deleted immediately, Mr Naik said. The police need not wait for any further procedure for the purpose, he said.

 ON NITIN GADKARI

Refering to Shri Nitin Gadkari’s criticism of Congress in Goa, Mr Naik said that Mr Gadkari is on deputation from RSS to BJP, and when his appointment was made there was an internal revolt in BJP.

Mr Naik said that Mr Gadkari’s ticket for Lok Sabha has not been cleared by any BJP Committee but that it is RSS which have decided whether Gadkari should contest or not. An extra-constitutional authority should decide about the ticket of a BJP’s National President, and that President, should give lectures to other political parties, is strange.

RELEASED FROM THE OFFICE OF GPCC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Protect Goa's natural beauty

                   Support Goa's first Tiger Reserve

 Sign the petition at:     http://www.goanet.org/petition/petition.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to