The image of women as safer managers who are less likely to fritter away a
bank’s finances is wrong – and politicians should take note, according to a
Bundesbank research report.

Board changes at banks that result in a higher proportion of female
executives “lead to a more risky conduct of business”, concluded the
authors of an extensive study
<http://www.bundesbank.de/download/volkswirtschaft/dkp/2012/201203dkp.pdf>of
German finance houses released by the country’s central bank.

They also find that younger executive teams increase risk-taking – but more
PhDs in management suites have the opposite effect.

The results, which counter the popular image of women managers as less
likely to take risks, could prove politically controversial. Ursula von der
Leyen <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ad2e176a-f8d1-11e0-a5f7-00144feab49a.html>,
Germany’s labour minister, is among European politicians pushing for
stronger measures to increase female board representation.

Such political pressure is based on a desire for greater gender equality,
the report’s authors note, but the impact on corporate behaviour is
discussed less. Their findings “suggest that a public policy debate must
take this impact into consideration”.

The three authors are Allen N. Berger, of the University of South Carolina;
Thomas Kick, of the Bundesbank; and Klaus Schaeck, of Bangor University.
Although it published the report, the Bundesbank said on Tuesday that the
results “do not necessarily reflect the views of the Deutsche Bundesbank or
its staff”. The Bundesbank has one woman – Sabine Lautenschläger, deputy
president – on its six-person board.

Explaining their controversial findings, based on an analysis of German
bank executive 
teams<http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/acc15442-32eb-11e0-9a61-00144feabdc0.html>
from
1994 to 2010, the report’s authors suggest a main reason is that women
executives tend to be “significantly less experienced” than male
counterparts and that a lack of experience drives risk taking.

Another explanation could be that, with women still rare in boardrooms,
their inclusion breaks up a clubby atmosphere. The authors write: “If group
members come from heterogeneous backgrounds in terms of experience and
values, this might increase the potential for conflict inside the group and
hinder decision-making.” The obstacles women face in entering bank boards
could also include accepting a higher risk exposurem, they add.

They are probably on less controversial ground in arguing that a decrease
in the average board age increases risk taking – and that regulators should
take a closer look at the ages of bank executives. According to the study,
a five-year reduction in the average age of a board’s members increases the
ratio of risk-weighted assets to total assets by 2.66.

Their conclusion that more executives with doctorates reduces risk taking
is attributed “to the fact that better educated executives employ more
sophisticated risk management techniques and adjust the business model
accordingly”.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cd4a3ac0-77f6-11e1-b437-00144feab49a.html?ftcamp=published_links/rss/companies_europe/feed//product#axzz1qKBOaB26


Comment:  hmm, I thought so, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!


g




-- 
DEV BOREM KORUM

Gabe Menezes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Protect Goa's natural beauty

                    Support Goa's first Tiger Reserve

  Sign the petition at:     http://www.goanet.org/petition/petition.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to