On 5 June 2012 09:53, Aires Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It is surprising that the six government advocates had objected to the > disclosure of their biodata. The irregularities that prevailed during > former Advocate General Subodh Kantak’s tenure are still continuing. One of > the Additional Government Advocate appointed on the recommendation of AG > Atmaram Nadkarni shockingly, had not even completed one year since passing > the law degree. How does the Goa government expect such a person to defend > the interest of the State before the High Court. > > > > Experience and competence should be the sole criteria in the appointment of > Government advocates. One wonders why Mr. Atmaram Nadkarni has not > appointed his Senior most assistant Adv. H.D.Naik as a Government advocate. > It is most improper and unethical that Adv. H.D.Naik continues to operate > from Mr. Atmaram Nadkarni’s office while representing mining companies > amongst others in petitions against the Goa Government. > > > Aires Rodrigues > T1 - B30, Ribandar Retreat > Ribandar - Goa - 403006 > Mobile: 9822684372 > RESPONSE: Only people who have something to hide would object too having their qualifications notified. -- DEV BOREM KORUM Gabe Menezes.
