My dear Soter, May I politely disagree with your line of thought?
And ... May I add that ONCE you post a message on to a public forum, the message is PUBLIC i.e. it may be quoted, re-quoted and discussed ad nauseam anywhere and by anybody in cyberspace. But then, you might be right about something UNETHICAL that Santoshbab did. I somehow get the feeling that you, Soter will now advise us of the ETHICAL principle Santoshbab violated. jc On 20 June 2012 22:19, SOTER <[email protected]> wrote: Below is a classic example of how some rationalist and secular cowards have been mischievously posting and diverting the forum of discussion from goanet to other mailing groups to which the author of the original post does not/does not desire to contribute or is not a member of. Merely sending a copy to the author does not mean the act is ETHICAL. Since the author is not part of debates on some particular group and does not wish to be, such acts are a deliberate attempt to forcibly draw him/her from goanet to other convenient forums. The author is often not aware of comments generated from the post on other forums and has no time to keeptrack and respond on every damn forum. Fortunately, I am well aware of these secularly rationalistic looking monkey tricks. ----- Original Message ----- From: Santosh Helekar To: goenchimxapotam ; soter d'souza Cc: ++ Subject: Re: Another persecution fantasy bites the dust
