Please allow me to express my delight, relief and gratitude that, this morning, among the GN posts, I read NO 'rear-admiralesque' abuse against women, with whom the 'communal' ones may or may not have partisan political differences.
Notice also that the Hacktivists and other Sala_Azarists have conveniently occupied themselves with Hututu and Kabbadi; Was there nothing worthwhile to comment about the "Inphormassun" ghotolla? Arre baba, NOT even a "poshter" kompetissun? jc On Jun 23, 2012, at 10:07 PM, "U. G. Barad" <[email protected]> wrote: > > What is exactly meant by 'bit more'? Why is it called 'bit more' to be > subtle / cunning / clever? Is creating quota within quota not an act of > leveraging religion based politics (this is only a recent example!)? Which > of the diverse trends did congress succeeded in incorporating so far for the > betterment of India and Indians? U. G. Barad > > > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, FN in unique style wrote: And why should anyone think > the Congress is above leveraging religion-based politics? Except that it is > (a bit more) subtle about it. And it tries to incorporate diverse trends > within its diverse mahasagar! FN > >
