Tony de Sa wrote:
> All those who support the British and Pork n geese imperialist bandidos 
> are running dog lackeys.  Thus spake the Chairman Mao of blessed memory
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tony,
Here is a reminder of the brutality of colonialism.
Mervyn2012
xxxxxxxxxxxxx



London’s High Court hears of castration, rape and beatings in the Empire
July 17th, 2012

ESTELLE SHIRBON  — Reuters


    * Three elderly Kenyans who were tortured in detention under British orders 
in the 1950s took the witness stand in London’s High Court on Tuesday in 
poignant scenes that conjured up the darkest days of the end of Empire.

They are seeking damages from the British government, which has been trying for 
three years to block their legal action for fear that it could encourage 
countless other former colonial subjects to come forward with similar claims.

The claimants, now in their 70s and 80s, suffered acts of brutality including 
castration, rape and beatings during a ruthless crackdown by British forces and 
their Kenyan allies on rebels from the Mau Mau movement fighting for land and 
freedom.

One of the three to take the stand was Paulo Nzili, 85. In his 20-page witness 
statement, he gave excruciating details of how he was castrated at Embakasi 
detention camp by a white settler called Mr. Dunman and nicknamedLuvai, which 
in Mr. Nzili’s Kikamba language means “merciless person.”

“They tied both of my legs with chains and … pinned down both my hands. 
Then Luvai approached me with a pair of pliers which were more than a foot long 
and castrated me,” he said in the statement, which was based on his oral 
account.

Mr. Nzili was not asked to revisit his abuse on the stand, but to confirm he 
had recounted his story to the people who drew up the statement, and to confirm 
he had signed it, which he did.

Jane Muthoni Mara, 73, confirmed the thumb print on her witness statement was 
her own. The document makes horrifying reading, with details of sexual abuse 
including rape using a bottle full of boiling water.

Dressed in a skirt and cardigan, both with colourful patterns, and a 
red-and-yellow head scarf, Ms. Mara spoke so softly that the judge politely 
asked her to speak up.

Tens of thousands of rebels were killed during the British crackdown and about 
150,000 Kenyans, many of them unconnected to the Mau Mau, were detained in 
brutal camps referred to as “Britain’s Gulag” by Harvard historian Caroline 
Elkins.

The first claimant to take the stand on Tuesday was Wambugu Wa Nyingi, 84, who 
was arrested in 1952 and spent almost a decade in detention at various camps 
run by the British and staffed jointly by British guards and Kenyan “loyalists.”

In his statement, Mr. Nyingi described severe beatings as a routine part of 
life in the camps. Tall and frail, he was helped to the witness stand by his 
interpreter.

He answered questions from Guy Mansfield, the government’s counsel, who focused 
on two topics: the fact that some perpetrators of abuse were Kenyans, and that 
after independence successive Kenyan leaders were hostile to Mau Mau veterans.

Mr. Nyingi became animated in discussing the issue of how Kenya’s first two 
presidents, Jomo Kenyatta and Daniel arap Moi, had oppressed veterans of the 
armed struggle for independence.

“We were not allowed to meet in public. We were still in prison … because we 
were not allowed to talk freely,” he said, jabbing his fingers on the stand for 
emphasis.

His evidence was a stark reminder of how divisive the Mau Mau movement remains 
in Kenyan society.

Tuesday was the second day of a 10-day hearing. The court is not being asked to 
make a ruling on the substance of the Kenyans’ allegations but to decide 
whether a fair trial can be held so long after the events.

The British government’s position is that the case was filed too long after the 
time limit for making a claim. The claimants’ lawyers argue that as there is a 
mass of documentary and other evidence on the period, a fair trial is possible.

The government has used legal arguments to try and stop their claim. That 
strategy has been denounced by South Africa’s Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who has 
accused Britain of hypocrisy for criticizing the human rights record of other 
countries while refusing to face up to its own.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/londons-high-court-hears-of-castration-rape-and-beatings-in-the-empire/article4424253/  

Reply via email to