Roland Francis <[email protected]> wrote: [1] One of the privileges of leisure writing is that one does not have to explain one's thought processes.
[2] it is sufficient to truthfully lay down what one observes and then let the readers deal with what has been written. [3] I take umbrage to the context and manner in which you have used the word "anonymous". What part of maintaining privacy are you not understanding, or are you implying I made that message up. [4] our resident gold expert whose accounting for past SINS is now drawing near. Earlier [5] Mervyn420, [6] Here is an email message from a Toronto lady, a complete stranger to me. I have shortened her full name to an initial to maintain her privacy. COMMENT: a: Has the censor-board of Goanet taken leave of absence OR it is that some of the Goanet posting rules been repealed.(please see #s 4 and 5 supra) b: Yes, Roland, you are right. One of the privileges of leisure writing, indeed, is that one does not have to explain one's thought processes. But, I am sure (almost) that you will agree that privileges come with responsibilities. BTW: On what basis have you attached that 420 where you have? c: Regarding the "unknown" person whom you quoted, How do you know it was a "Toronto lady" and not ....? d: re "PAST SINS", are you aware of the parable which deals with that? i.e. "He That Is Without Sin Among You, Let Him First Cast a Stone" I have read Eugene's post on this matter. I hope you have read it too. e: Could it be that the problem is likely less with the Canadian Goan women than it is with the one who is casting the chauvinistic stone on them? jc ps: Not very sure if the goanet censors will allow this through. It is fine. I support their right to Salazarise my writing. In any event, my final post on this topic.....for now.
