Dears, A preface followed by a few questions:
Preface: based on what I know of the personal 'sweat' that Gabe and Lily have contributed to the organization in reference, I believe that it would have been an act of shameless ingratitude for the AGM to resolve to ' bar his entry'. Fortunately, it appears that it was slime. Questions: 1: after their experience with the Toronto GOA fiasco, WHY did the Goanet modradors allow this canard from RF? 2: when will RF withdraw this bogusity (albeit in the form of a question) and expose the loon who whispered this in his proverbial ear? 3: hasn't RF done enough mischief for one semester? 4: who is he a proxy for? 5: could I request that he writes some positive stuff, instead, please 6: what offensive garbage is this PPP nonsense? jc ps: unsure if this post will pass the Salazar machine. Pardon any Typos. This IPad does some curious auto- corrections > On 7 August 2012 05:08, Roland Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gabe, are you barred entry from association functions by a resolution passed >> at an Annual General Meeting, apparently the only life member in the history >> of the association to be so barred. >> >> A clear and unequivocal answer will suffice to establish the fact of that >> matter and enlighten those like me who are aghast at the constant and >> oftentimes unnecessary criticism of the volunteer association's activities >> on this forum over the years from your direction. >> >> Roland. >> Toronto. >> > > Gabe's Aug 16, 2012 COMMENT:- > > Now more than a week has gone by and no show by an alumnus of the India > famous, if not World famous, Xavier's of Bombay. Not a dicky bird, no come > back, no retraction, I guess it was taken as a frivolity and of no > consequence. Suddenly you have become gun shy. The Jesuit education of > decency and honesty gone out of the window! I am sure you would have had me > on the rack one way or other, a determined effort to put down; alas it has > all floundered. Is this behaviour known as xinkon brute? > > So what's up, the Cat's got your tongue? You have shown yourself as a > dishonourable person. > > Whoever fed you the spurious information was unable to produce - probably > checked all the past AGM & EGM Minutes and came up zilch; had the expensive > Search Engines whirring to no avail. All the best your informant came to was > nought and you have been left with egg on your face but you are not decent > enough to do the right thing! > > You asked me an impertinent question and I answered... > > There was no resolution passed at any AGM barring me from attending any GOA > UK Function. The way you have acted shows the makings of a man or maybe not!
