On 7 October 2012 10:37, Nelson Lopes <[email protected]> wrote:

1: Easement rights should not have priority to deny these essential
services to anyone seekinhg them and co lateral damage caused by claim
of easement rights over trees must necessasrily reimburse the damage
to life and property by the force of ammendment of  antiquated laws

2: The easement rights must be ammended to take into considerations
these obstructive mentality, specially in the villages

COMMENT:

I wonder if Nelson would do well by reviewing the above two points
(excerpted by me) from his post.

In particular: What is the meaning of Easement?

best

jc

Reply via email to