18-Nov-2012

Dear Friend,

Most people try to influence others and exercise control over people either 
openly or in subtle ways! Leaders exercise power and dominate others in the 
hope that that they might leave a mark and be remembered as great and powerful 
human beings in history. But there are people who have all the power they need 
but refuse to control or dominate people. They exercise an even greater 
influence on others when they choose to serve others! Such a man was Jesus 
Christ the King whose kingdom was one of love and service to humankind. Have a 
grateful weekend acknowledging Him as Our King! Fr. Jude

Sunday Reflections: Feast of Christ the King: "I am King! My kingdom is not of 
this world!" 25-Nov-2012

Readings: Daniel 7: 13-14Apocalypse 1: 5-8John 18: 33-37

The first reading from the Book of Daniel speaks to the people in exile, who 
were disillusioned about the kings who ruled over them. The prophet says, "Your 
God is coming to you, your King is come to you. He is not from below, He comes 
from the heavens. He will come to save you. Yes he is Lord and King but 
different from earthly rulers. The point of the reading is that God is coming 
to his people. He will not be like the kings who have led the people astray, 
who have used their power for their own personal glory, who have dominated and 
crushed the spirit of the people. The Son of man will come to bring hope to his 
people, and his kingdom will never end, this hope no one can take away.

The King and I
In 1956 actor Yul Brynner won an Academy Award for his role as the bald and 
autocratic King of Siam in the movie The King and I. The film was based on the 
musical written by Rogers and Hammerstein for Broadway, where Brynner also 
played the part for a record number of times. In this musical, the King of Siam 
imports a British governess to his exotic kingdom to educate his children. At 
the start they have frequent cultural clashes, but in the end the king and the 
governess form a true and lasting friendship. Have we discovered our King and 
our royal calling?
Albert Cylwicki in 'His Word Resounds'

The Gospel reading goes on to stress how different this King is from the kings 
of the earth; totally different, a sign of contradiction. The whole idea of 
Christ being king does not come up at the height of his popularity but at the 
moment when every one, all his disciples and followers have abandoned him. When 
he seems to be powerless at that moment he claims kingship. "Yes I am a king. I 
was born for this, I came into the world for this." His kingship consists in 
bearing witness to the truth; "all who are on the side of truth will listen to 
my voice." In the Gospel we see the Kingship of Jesus contrasted with worldly 
power. Pontius Pilate was the Governor of Judea, a powerful man who questioned 
Jesus to judge his innocence or guilt. Yet it would seem that Jesus is 
questioning Pilate and he is made to face the truth. Pilate is ill at ease 
while Jesus is the one who is in control. Jesus points out that his kingship is 
not in the realm of political
 struggle or power. His kingdom is not of this world.  Jesus has surrendered 
all power He came not to be served but to serve. Today this King invites us to 
serve those in need.

When it is the judge who is on trial
Sometimes in a court case it can happen that it is not so much the accused who 
is on trial but the judge. Indeed, sometimes it is the very concept of justice 
itself that is on trial. Take the case of Louise Woodward, the 19-year-old 
English au pair whom a jury in Massachusetts convicted in 1998 of killing an 
eight-month-old baby, Mathew Eappen, who died in her care. But many people who 
followed the trial were convinced that a miscarriage of justice had taken 
place. In view of conflicting medical evidence, it was hard to see how the jury 
could have found, beyond reasonable doubt, that she had killed the baby. Her 
defense team appealed against the verdict. At the start of the case, Louise was 
the one who was on trial. But now the focus shifted onto the judge, Hiller 
Zobel, who was reviewing the verdict. As we waited for his ruling, questions 
were raised as to his character. It was said that he was a very 
independent-minded man. A man not swayed by popular
 opinion, or one who bowed to pressure. The verdict he reached would show if 
those claims were true. Now it was Judge Zobel who was on trial. After careful 
deliberation Zobel changed the jury's verdict of second degree murder to 
involuntary manslaughter. Yes, a child was dead, and Louise bore some blame for 
his death. But she was not a murderer. And since she had already served 
seventeen months in prison, he set her free. In the eyes of most neutral 
observers, his verdict was a fair one. Judge Zobel emerged from the trial with 
an enhanced reputation. He was shown to be a man who was passionately concerned 
about justice.
Flor McCarthy in 'New Sunday and Holy Day Liturgies'

The King and I
Soren Kierkegaard was a philosopher and theologian who lived in Denmark about 
150 years ago. In one of his books there is a story about a king who fell in 
love with a peasant girl. The king knew that it was next to impossible for him 
to marry the girl. Kings never married peasants; they always married royalty. 
But this king was so powerful that he knew that he would marry the girl and get 
away with it. But another thought occurred to him. If he married the peasant 
girl and stayed king, there would always be something missing in their 
relationship. The girl would always admire the king, but she could never really 
love him. The gap between them would be too great. She would always be 
conscious of the fact that he was royalty and she was merely a lowly peasant. 
So the king decided on another plan. He decided that he would resign his 
kingship and become a lowly peasant himself. Then he would offer his love to 
her as one peasant to another. The King realized,
 of course, that if he did this, the situation could backfire. He could not 
only loose his kingdom but the girl as well. She might reject him, especially 
if she thought him foolish for doing what he did. And so the King had a 
problem. What should he do? The King finally decided that he loved the peasant 
girl so much that he would risk everything to make true love between them 
possible.

- Kierkegaard never told how the story ended. He never told whether the girl 
accepted the king's love or rejected it. He never told whether they lived 
happily ever after or not. Kierkegaard had two reasons for not telling how the 
story ended.  Firstly the point of his story was the king's love for the lowly 
peasant girl. It was so great that he renounced his royalty and his throne for 
her. The second reason why Kierkegaard never told how the story ended is that 
the story has not ended yet. It is still going on. It is a story whose ending 
has not been written. It is the story of God's love for each one of us. The 
King in the story is God; the girl in the story is us. Only we can write the 
end of that story! What will it be???
Anonymous

The interview is over
The story is told of a man who travelled to London to attend an interview for 
an important post in the security services. When he arrived at the appointed 
place he found five other applicants in the waiting room, all discussed their 
prospects. There was no security on duty. A sign on the wall stated that 
applicants were to knock and enter the interview room at fifteen-minute 
intervals, beginning at eleven o'clock. They were to leave the interview room 
by another door, so the nature of the questioning could be kept secret. The 
applicants discussed this strange arrangement; they reflected on what questions 
they might be asked; they wondered what qualities would be needed for the post. 
At eleven o'clock, one of them who said he had been the first to arrive went to 
the door of the interview room, knocked and entered. The remaining five men 
continued to discuss various matters among themselves. So, the time passed. At 
a quarter past twelve the last man to
 arrive rose from the chair, walked over to the door of the interview room, 
knocked and entered. When he stepped into the room he was confused by what he 
saw. Behind the large oak table that dominated the room sat his interviewers: 
they were the same five men who had been in the waiting room. The interview was 
already over! -We believe our final interview with the Lord and King will be on 
judgment day. In reality it has begun! "What you did to the least of my 
brethren you did unto me."
Anonymous

The Master's symphony
God was the composer of the music of the universe. He wrote a symphony of 
heavenly music, all in perfect harmony. To the birds of the air he entrusted 
the pan pipes, to the long grass he entrusted the strings. To the clouds and 
the oceans he entrusted the percussion. He allotted sections of the orchestra 
to all parts of his creation. There was one section of his creation that he 
decided to treat differently, i.e. human beings. He had gifted them with reason 
and intelligence, and therefore there was no need to write the score for them, 
as they would know how to blend and harmonize, without receiving instructions. 
The music began and it was heavenly. The harmony was enchanting, and the sheer 
beauty of it all was breathe-taking. Things continued like this for some time. 
Then one day there was a shrieking discordant note that shattered the harmony 
of the universe. This was followed by complete silence. "What was that?" 
whispered the trees. The birds replied
 "That was people. They refuse to continue in harmony with the rest of us, and 
they have decided to do things their way." What will he do now? whispered the 
grass. "He may tear up the whole score. He may write a new one. One thing is 
certain he cannot pretend it did not happen, because that discordant note will 
reverberate throughout the universe for eternity." And what do you think God 
did? He searched among every sound that ever was, until he found the discordant 
note. He took that note, used it as a theme, and wrote a whole new score based 
solely on that note. Out of that discordant note he wrote a whole new symphony 
of heavenly beauty, which we now call salvation. The story of salvation is 
based on our weakness and failure. Only God could think of such a thing!
Jack McArdle in 'And that's the Gospel truth'

That man died for you
In April 1865, the slain body of President Abraham Lincoln lay in state for a 
few hours in Cleveland, Ohio. It was on its final journey from the nation's 
capital to Springfield, Illinois. In the long line up of people filing by the 
body was a poor black woman and her little son. When the two reached the 
president's body, the woman lifted up her son and said in a hushed voice: 
"Honey take a good long look. That man died for you." What that black mother 
said to her child can be said about Jesus by every mother of every child. 
Pointing to the body of Jesus on the crucifix, she can say: "Honey, take a 
long, long look. That man died for you." And so Jesus is the King of Kings. He 
is the King of Kings not only because of who he is but because of what he did.
Mark Link in 'Sunday Homilies'

Let's be loyal to our Lord and King and live to spread His Kingdom!

 
Fr. Jude Botelho
[email protected]

PS. The stories, incidents and anecdotes used in the reflections have been 
collected over the years from books as well as from sources over the net and 
from e-mails received. Every effort is made to acknowledge authors whenever 
possible. If you send in stories or illustrations I would be grateful if you 
could quote the source as well so that they can be acknowledged if used in 
these reflections. These reflections are also available on my web site 
www.netforlife.net Thank you.

Reply via email to