I suggest the following: 1: before offering 'insinuations' that a conspiracy-theory is being advanced, please ask for an explanation.
2: refer back to the title of the topic ..... and ask yourself the question (in the title). 3: once you have tried to answer the WHY in the question, you will understand that your 'conspiracy' nonsense was not only 'anti-brilliant', it also was pompous and condescending. jc Bravo to the 'Yoo Hoo' wallahs! On Nov 21, 2012, at 2:24 PM, Frederick FN Noronha wrote: > Could you explain instead of offering insinuations and name-calling? I > believe the diversity we have in rendering Romi comes from just that -- > diversity in society, and the linguistic influences different generations > have had here. Somone influenced by the Portuguese alphabet would render the > language quite different from the English-educated generation. > > What works, works. Why should we be afraid of diversity anyway? FN > > -- > > On 21 November 2012 17:53, J. Colaco < jc> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> An ostrich was considering taking his neck out from the sand. >> >> He hasn't yet. >> >> To be continued, when he does. >> >> jc >> >> ------- >> >> Earlier: >> Frederick FN Noronha wrote: Yoo hoo! What's the latest conspiracy theory? >> I'm dying to hear it.. >> >> ------- >> J. Colaco < jc> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> Domnic Fernandes asked: Why abrupt changes in Roman script Konkani? >> >> CLUE: Check who heads the alleged Romi Script agenda. >> >> hummm. >>>> >>
