On 28 November 2012 13:12, Nelson Lopes <[email protected]> wrote:
[1] The tapes by Jindals are considered authentic [2] In order to BUFFER their contentions Jindals approached several publications, but did not provide the authentic recordings and hence not published. [3] The jindals could have filed for DEFAMATION as an alternative [4] They were working on a diabolic, treacherous plot, outsmarting the news agency [5] The jidals then LAUNCHED a criminal investigations through the police and two of the journalists involved are arrested and GRANTED police custody. [6] These arrests are taking PRECEDENCE over extortions My dear Nelsonbab, I am not very sure that you really wanted to use the words I have CAPPED. Accepting that there may be NO truly "innocent" parties in this case, you may additionally wish to consider the following: a: Defamation is post-ipso facto, not antes. b: It isn't really 'diabolical' and/or 'treacherous' for one to outsmart a potential extortionist? c: No private party can launch a criminal investigation. As far as your question (in the subject line) is concerned, please visit the link at the foot of this post. A significant portion of the audio and transcript is in Hindi (devanagri) You judge for yourself. ps: Let us never forget that politicians are no Sati Savitris or Sadhu Sanths. jc http://tinyurl.com/tukaANImaka
