I could not find an answer to my question in Kishwar's multi-part article, regarding Modi's culpability in the killing of 2000 innocent people by acts of commission and/or omission. I only found the usual political justifications and post-hoc rationalizations by Kishwar.
Cheers, Santosh P.S. BTW, I have absolutely no problem believing that U. G. Barad is sincere in his condemnation of killing of innocent people. Questioning whether he condones it, and by doing so implying that he does, is one of the most disgusting political tactics that I have seen being repeatedly employed in this forum against people who just happen to have a different opinion. ----- Original Message ----- U. G. Barad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps Shekar Gupta has read the Kishwar articles, which does provide they > answers to the questions that Santosh wanted to ask, and so he did not ask > them. > ....................................................... > > As usual tactic, Marshall introduced new topic in this conversation on the > unprofessionalism (or otherwise) of Shekar Gupta! > > His second question to me is: “Does he condone the violence and subsequent > hijacking of justice?” Can any sane person condone the unnecessary death of > even one person anywhere in the world? Re the ‘hijacking of justice’, this > is a loaded statement, and is actually a sort of condemnation of the Supreme > Court which has appointed its own investigation team, etc. >
