URGENT PRESS STATEMENT:

Protest Letter and an Appeal has been addressed to the MP's not to support the  
Bill  likely to be presented in Parliament to amend the RTI act which is 
self-explanatory.

Thousands of citizens have signed this letter and some of them have been listed 
in the said letter.

warm regards,
Dolphy D'souza
Convenor
POLICE REFORMS WATCH
43, Kalina, Santacruz East,
Mumbai 400 029.
Tel: 09820226227
Email: [email protected] 

To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] 
; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] 
; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:10 PM
Subject: RTI Amendments


My Dear Member of Parliament,

                I am writing this piece to you to voice my concern about a 
matter which is very important to me. There are reports in the media, that a 
bill is likely to be presented in Parliament to amend the RTI Act. The reasons 
being given publicly are that the CIC order declaring political parties as 
Public authorities, subject to RTI is bad in law. My understanding is that if 
an order which is bad in law is issued by any statutory authority, the correct 
process is to challenge it at an appropriate forum. The CIC order can be 
challenged in a writ in the High Court, and there are many instances of these 
orders having been quashed in Courts.  None of the political parties has filed 
for a stay of this order, and now expect to amend the law in Parliament to 
justify and legitimize their defiance of a statutory order. With folded hands I 
plead with you not to vote for this. Parliament makes the law. Once it is made, 
it has to be adjudicated by the appropriate statutory authorities.  This is the 
Constitutional process. Defying a statutory order by anyone sets a wrong 
example, and leads to breakdown of the rule of law. After considerable 
discussion spread over months, and reference to a Parliamentary Committee this 
law was passed. It has been rated as the second best law in the World. Citizens 
cherish and value it immensely, since it codifies a very important fundamental 
right of ours.

The law has been used fairly extensively and has uncovered certain 
arbitrariness and corruption. More importantly, it has empowered the individual 
sovereign citizen, who is today getting greater respect from many entities. The 
key principle in defining the bodies to be covered by the RTI Act was based on 
the movement’s slogan, “Hamara Paisa, Hamara Hisab.” Hence all Government 
bodies were covered by the RTI Act and also other Institutions which may be 
‘substantially funded’ by Government were covered. This was the Act passed by 
Parliament, based on which the CIC has passed an order. I do concede that there 
is some reasonable scope for a different opinion on what constitutes 
‘substantial funding’ and if the political parties feel that the CIC decision 
is flawed, they could challenge it in Court.  Parties have said that they are 
being monitored by the Election Commission and the Income Tax department, and 
hence they need not provide information to Citizens. All Institutions including 
Parliament are legitimized to be intermediaries on behalf of ‘We the People’. 
None of these can replace the people of India. 
Some worries have been voiced about how the political parties will be able to 
cope with the RTI queries. I might point out that many small NGOs and aided 
schools are complying with RTI without a major stress.

Subjecting themselves to Right to Information by citizens has not damaged any 
Institution in the Country. Some political representatives have claimed that 
they would not like to be questioned about their processes of decision making. 
RTI only gives access to citizens to the records of a Public authority, and 
does not entitle the citizen to question the merits of the decisions.  Besides 
there are ten exemptions in Section 8 (1) for information which need not be 
disclosed and these exemptions passed by Parliament have worked well, and not 
resulted in damaging any Institution since 2005. There is some recognition in 
most quarters that it is slowly leading to getting some corrections and 
improvements in Institutions and strengthening the hands of those who work in 
the spirit of Public service and probity. 

It is true that there is a trust deficit between citizens and political 
leaders. RTI will overcome this, and lead to a better understanding of the 
working of various political parties. It will lead to citizens making a more 
informed choice of political parties during elections. Besides, it will promote 
better and systematic functioning of the political parties, once they subject 
themselves to monitoring by the people they seek to serve. I am sure you are 
concerned with the decline in the levels of probity in public service. This is 
an opportunity to reverse this and start the journey towards a more meaningful 
service of people. I am sure you are as concerned with the future of politics 
and your party in a decade from now, as I am. Let us work together for a better 
political democracy with a long term vision for a better India. Please do not 
vote for any amendments to the RTI Act. If your party is not going to vote for 
amendments to the RTI Act, please state this publicly.
Your Voters

Justice Ajit Prakash Shah                   Julio Ribeiro                       
 Charles Correa                                  
TSR Subramanian                             Sandeep Pandey                 DM 
Sukthankar
Gerson Da’ Cunha                             Narayan Varma                  
Venkatesh Nayak
Yogendra Yadav                                Harinesh Pandya                
Shailesh Gandhi
Pankti Jog, Bhaskar Prabhu, Dolphy D’souza, Samir Zaveri, Mohamed Afzal, 
Krishnaraj Rao,
Alex D’mello, G.R.Vora, Greg Periera, Sunil Ahya, Anand Castellino, Lekha 
Menon, Mitesh Gangar, Nilesh Ambekar, Deepak Sethi, Saumya Bahadur, Bhavesh 
Pandya, Joseph Dias, 
Yogesh Bhatia, Stalin D, Yogesh Agarwal, Raja Bunch, Rumion Records, Shifra 
Patel,
Naveen Fernandes, Zameer Khan, Asad, Sujit Patwardhan, Jacob Williams, Rajkumar 
Sharma,
Narendra Dengle, Manoj Bajaj, Nachiket and Jayoo Patwardhan, Raymond Barboza. 
Rajeev Patel, Stanley Fernandez

Reply via email to