On 3 October 2013 04:34, floriano lobo <[email protected]> wrote:
> The statement from the Bishop's Palace is clear. There arises no cause for > any protests or demands controversy on the part of parishioner/s on the > working of the Bishop's Palace administration in force. If at all, > parishioners are dis-satisfied with the Rule-Book of the Bishop's > Administration, then they should ask for appropriate amendments. The Rule > Book should continue amended or otherwise to have full impact on the > working of the Church in Goa. There is no way parishioners can force their > will on the Administration of the Bishop's Palace w.r.t. the Rule Book in > force. > > However, the moot question here is: > > WHERE IS FR. JAMES?? IS HE IN GOA? IF HE IS, ONLY HE CAN PUT LIGHT ON THIS > CONTROVERSY. BUT, IF THE PARISHIONERS ARE MOVING AHEAD WITH THEIR DEMANDS, > IT IS PURE ANARCHY AND MUST BE CONSIDERED AS SUCH. IT WILL AFFECT THE > ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION OF THE CHURCH IN GOA. IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY > AND ESSENTIAL THAT FR. JAMES MAKES A STATEMENT AND PUT ALL THIS UNNECESSARY > AND UNCALLED FOR CONTROVERSY TO END. > > FINALLY, PARISHIONERS CANNOT HOLD THE BISHOP'S PALACE ADMINISTRATION TO > RANSOM. > > IF SO, PEOPLE WOULD HAVE ASKED 'JESUS' TO DO WHAT THEY WANTED HIM TO DO' > > Cheers > floriano > goasuraj > 9890470896 > > The question that arises here > > RESPONSE: Aree baba, Fr James left and went to the U.S. of A.! The green bill is better, much better than the torn Rupee...
