On 6/19/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The work on providing updated packages for GoboLinux 013 continues.
> >
> > The goal is to have updated packages for all programs listed at
> > http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/013_packages_list
> >
> > The currently built packages are at:
> > http://www.rsync.gobolinux.org/013-packages/
> >
> > I've prepared a list of recipes which require some special care:
> > http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/013_recipe_problems
> > Help on those is specially wanted.
>
> I've worked on Gawk, Less, Util-Linux and on XFSProgs (the package
> XFS-Utils was probably named manually, as its tarball is not called
> that way)
>
> However, I couldn't install XFSProgs gracefully with FiboSandbox. It
> didn't allow me to install files under //Programs/XFSProgs/2.7.11/lib.
> I've relaxed the rules and added a --no-sandbox, as the install target
> behaves fine.
>
> Recipes and binary packages were just uploaded to the store and rsync
> repository, respectivelly.
Do we really need XFS stuff in the ISO? I don't think there are any
Gobo users running XFS by now. We added that stuff long ago to
Rafael's request (and I suffered quite a bit to get it to compile
right) <flame>...and last I checked, his filesystem of choice lately
seems to be HFS+...</flame>
There's a lot of new stuff we probably want to add to the ISO, so
something has got to go out, anyway...
-- Hisham
ps: just kidding, Rafael. :) if you feel the urge to reply, do it offlist. ;)
I guess it was my fault too, as I was (and still am) relying a
partition on XFS hands. But I have no problems on removing it from the
ISO.
--
Lucas
powered by /dev/dsp
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
