Yes, there is a bug when compiling xmkmf recipes. Follow the patch.
On 9/3/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can do it tomorrow. Any additional change to be done before a release? On 9/3/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/2/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:44:52 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Although signature support is really relevant, most of our binary > > > packages still don't have correct signatures. So, it look like to me > > > we are 'crying wolf' at this time, and, in the future, when we got to > > > have all our packages signed, the user may look to a signature error > > > from a package that _was_ hacked and think "Oh that's normal. All I > > > have to do is to force the installation.". > > > > > More things to add to this is that there's a bug in the current release, > > making VerifyProgram die on _all_ packages. This is correted in CVS. > > I'm mostly offline right now (hopefully this will get fixed in the > next few days), but if you guys want to pack a new release of Scripts, > I say go ahead. I think André can pack and release them from current > CVS easily. > > -- Hisham > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-devel mailing list > gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel > -- Andre Detsch _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
Compile-xmkmf-bug.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
