On 9/9/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shouldn't we have two variables, like $goboPrefix _and_ $goboCrossPrefix? > Its look like to me we are at this moment using a same variable for > two different purposes, and they conflict sometimes (like in the > report made by Dan).
Actually we already have $cross_prefix_dir, specified in Cross-ARCH.conf. The idea of using $goboPrefix was that we could use much of the infrastructure already created for Rootless, as in the end the problem is almost the same: dealing with programs and files in a different prefix. > Having these two variables available, we could probably use something > like $goboPrefix/$goboCrossPrefix/<path> in many places, instead of That's more tricky, as $cross_prefix_dir might be outside the user's home dir in the case of Rootless. I'm not sure about which alternative is better in this case. Any suggestions are welcome, of course. The only problem I see on doing that is that we'll end needing to touch and replicate tests everywhere. Just grep for goboPrefix inside Scripts/Current to take an idea of the problem. -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
