On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:48 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is > > swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just > > aren't designed to allow it, especially for some advanced features > > (sending signals, logging). This means Tasks are required. Having > > two solutions (Tasks and Daemons) leads to confusion. Since Tasks are > > conceptually simpiler they seem to be winning. > > > I guess this means that Daemons are obsolete? >
I don't know. > > > > Right now our bootscripts are very 80s BSD. I'd love to see it > > modernized. Moving to the common init.d/rc#.d isn't a real > > improvement. Upstart is very interesting. The "need" based > > dependency inits seem to be an improvement but really aren't (see my > > aBootScripts from years past). I'm also concerned about distracting > > from the 013 release. > > > I think that if we don't have a feature freeze on 013 by now, we really > should set one. Isn't it stable enough to get a RC out soon? > I think our prime consern is to get a stable 013 out and when that is out > we could start looking at more features. I have some ideas on what I'd > like on 014... :) > I would say its good enough for installed systems but the LiveCD experience needs some more work. > > WRT Daemon monitor daemon. I believe, the Daemon shell function > > implements a simple one in sh for each daemon being monitored. > > > Afaik we don't ship with any monitoring daemon. > Look at /P/BootScripts/Current/Functions/BootScripts. There's a commented out impl that supports daemon restart. Installing runit should provide a better Daemon. -- Carlo J. Calica _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel