On 10/20/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/20/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > CVSROOT:        /sources/goboscripts
> > Module name:    tools
> > Changes by:     Jonas Karlsson <mohjive>        06/10/20 12:34:40
> >
> > Modified files:
> >         Scripts/bin    : SandboxInstall
> >
> > Log message:
> >         Fix for bu #2, cleaning up target directory when fibo sandbox
> fails
>
> I have been wondering about what to do with the program's contents in
> this case. The trace file you've attached to the bug shows that there
> was a binary file installed inside $target/bin.
>
> I think that we should take into account the user's choice on
> "existing entry at /Programs, [r]emove, [k]eep, [w]hatever" when
> cleaning up the broken installation: if the user has chosen to keep
> it, just use the fix you've just commited; if the user has chosen to
> remove it, the fix should also remove $target entirely.
>
> Does this look sane?

In any case, that should not be implemented inside SandboxInstall.
And *please*, let's keep the CVS tree frozen now that we're in release
candidate status, and apply verified (as in, "patch discussed in the
list") bugfixes only. As we could see yesterday, even "minor harmless
commits" can introduce bugs.

-- Hisham
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Reply via email to