On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:51:30 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wasn't aware of that it was the id generated by the client that was >> used >> for threading. [...] > > Oh. See RFC 2822 section 3.6.4: > > The "In-Reply-To:" field will contain the contents of the "Message- > ID:" field of the message to which this one is a reply (the "parent > message"). If there is more than one parent message, then the "In- > Reply-To:" field will contain the contents of all of the parents' > "Message-ID:" fields. If there is no "Message-ID:" field in any of > the parent messages, then the new message will have no "In-Reply-To:" > field. > > The "References:" field will contain the contents of the parent's > "References:" field (if any) followed by the contents of the parent's > "Message-ID:" field (if any). [...] > > Hope that helps, Well, it would have helped earlier. I've already dumped the headers on some mails and come to the above conclussion . :) -- /Jonasa Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
