On 3/13/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Community (15) > > | > > +--> Discussions (22) > > | > > +--> Roadmaps (?, currently mixed in with Community) > > I wouldn't have found Roadmaps under Community. :)
You would not have had to! This is a category hierarchy. It is *not* the navigation hierarchy. The two will be similar, but not identical. Conceptually, I see the roadmap being a function of the community - a repesentation of the community's will and desire (or at least devel team's). The category hierarchy is a maintenance tool, and not primarily a navigation tool. > Doesn't it worth a Development category, which may further include info about > the previous releases (what they had packaged in), and what's being > considered for the new ones (alongside the roadmap itself, which usually > provides a not-much-detailed big-picture of the coming releases)? Previous releases would either be Platforms or in the Of Historical Interest category. Ooops! Looks like the Of Historical Interest category did not make my category hierarchy. It was supposed to. I'll add it in (but I'll have to think about where it belongs). > Is there an automated way to do [track the review process] or will require > explicit > information by who is updating it? This is something to research. Templates may help. Wikipedia/MediaWiki may have a "this page last patrolled by" feature, but I'm not sure how extensive it is, or if it is suitable here. It may just be an anti-vandalism feature. I want to know: who, when and optionally at what software version the page was last reviewed. Any method that will display that information *on the page* (as opposed to in the page history) is fine with me. -mpb _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
