On 3/14/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't like too much to have more config files spread over
> /System/Settings. What about moving everything to these files (again),
> writing simple pre/post tasks as functions inside them? Another option
> is to enhance NetworkOptions like this:
>
> eth0_pre_hook() {
>     echo "hi"
> }
> eth0_post_hook() {
>     echo "bye"
> }
> eth0_IP=10.0.202.21
> ...
>

I thought of that but I was worried about scope.  My sh scripting is
rusty.  Ok, after a quick test the scope isn't a problem.


On 3/13/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you feel it's the solution, go for it. As usual, my only concern is
> that adding features to boot-related scripts adds code potentially
> slowing the boot process down.

I think we should optimize for the noop case.  Which is better, a file
test ( [ -f /path/foo ] ) or searching the path?  The file test is a
bash builtin so it should be cheap.  Searching the path should be a
file test for each path entry.  During boot, PATH is only /S/L/Exec
and /S/L/Tasks, right?

I guess I'd prefer a single config file.  Slightly slower but more
convenient.  We could include empty functions for eth0.  The would
document them as well.




-- 
Carlo J. Calica
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Reply via email to