I know there were some discussions on our revision token when we introduced revisions on recipe, but I don't remeber the conclusion and why some decisions were made. One such case is the Imagemagick recipe. The Imagemagick developers release several revisions of each version, last version atm being 6.3.3-1, while we have 6.3.3-0 in the recipe store. However the recipe is named 6.3.3_0, i.e. the revision dash is replaced with an underscore and I can't remember the real reason behind that decision, if there ever were such a decision. Lucas remembered something about it being because it was easier (less visually confusing) to use underscores when the deelopers released revisions as we have dashes in our revisions, e.g. ImageMagick 6.3.3_0-r1 instead of 6.3.3-0-r1. However this breaks the update of the recipe as the dash is used in the URL in the recipe, so NewVersion tried to substitue 6.3.3_0 with 6.3.3-1 when I ran 'NewVersion imagemagick 6.3.3-1'. Because of that I think we should reise the decision of substituting dashes with underscore, as I believe functionality should come before visual comfort.
-- /Jonas Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
