On 4/3/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/3/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/3/07, Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - When removing programs under NFS or similiar i will not delete files > > > under NFS, but it's supposed that user has write access to that files, > > > in this case a simple RemoveBroken should work, if not the unlink > > > function should be hardcoded looking files in the system and unlinking > > > them, maybe adding some features to RemoveBroken. > > > > I did not fully understand this. I think the behavior should be simple > > and there should not be tests to detect NFS or anything like that. > > Carlo, any opinions on this? > > > > The issue is if RemoveProgram should follow the symlink and rm or just > remove the symlink. It is really a policy decision and not dependent > on local/network distinction. How about config file and --follow > (more descriptive than --force) to override. The default should be > not follow.
Sounds good, but I don't think the config file is needed, actually. Not follow as default and --follow as an option sounds good enough for me. -- Hisham _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
