On 9/14/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:50:08 +0100 > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This seems self-contradictory to me, because LGPL-2.1 says "You may > > not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the > > rights granted herein." By saying we may not impose any further > > restrictions *and* requiring us to apply additional terms, the author > > has not granted us a usable license and so we shouldn't distribute his > > work at all. > > Being so, nuke it. Does Ion really worth the hassle of possible legal > problems in the future?
Agreed. I suspect this contradiction will eventually be sorted out (either by the author reverting back to a standard license, by adopting a non-contradictory non-free license, or by a fork). In the mean time, as is the license is unusable. I believe we can keep the last LGPL-2.1 version in the recipe store and ignore these problematic versions until the situation comes to a conclusion. -- Hisham _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
