Hisham Muhammad wrote: > On 9/4/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hisham Muhammad wrote: >>> On 9/3/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm fighting with Udev as well. I'm working on a recipe for version >>>> 115. I'll post it here before committing. Could you test it? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>> And here is the Udev recipe I'm currently working with: >>> >>> http://hisham.gobolinux.org/Udev--115--recipe.tar.bz2 >> My system runs with that recipe (all "use new" Settings), but complains >> in log-messages about no "console" group because my system is 013-based. >> (should recipes depend on group selection policies? do they have a choice?) > > Thanks for the report. > > I'm going to post a revised version using various groups instead of > "console", because while debugging the ISO I soon realized that the > "console" group simplification is a big maintenance headache. Really > not worth it. I'll revert the changes made to use "console" (it's > going to be a pain to scan through everything to make sure I don't > miss anything).
Okay, this one broke my boot sequence. SymlinkProgram to restore your previous 115 (still using the newer one's Settings, i.e. rules), made it work. Maybe related to error message with newer one that /System/Kernel/Objects/block/*/uevent and /System/Kernel/Objects/block/*/*/uevent didn't exist, at /System/Links/Tasks/Udev line 47. Even now, the newer rules try to use groups cdrom, cdrw, console, and usb, that aren't on my system. Isaac _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
