On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:46 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: mohjive > > Date: 2008-04-07 06:46:33 -0700 (Mon, 07 Apr 2008) > > New Revision: 3153 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/ChrootCompile/bin/ChrootCompile > > Log: > > We no longer need Atool but we need LZMA-Utils. > > Why do we need LZMA-Utils? > > The fact that your new archiving scripts support them is not a strong > enough reason, since Atool supports a bunch of archive formats which > we never added to the base dependencies.
What's all this then? It might be worth noting that at the same time I submitted the LZMA-Utils recipe, I sent an lzma-patch to Atool, which is in the new (0.34.0) release, which I also submitted a recipe for, so the current version handles LZMA fine. I did these things so that I could Compile the latest version (6.10) of CoreUtils, which has only been released in .tar.gz and .tar.lzma, the latter being 5.2 megs smaller (out of 8.8!) and I was not downloading 5 extra megs over dialup. So, since CoreUtils are fairly important, LZMA-archive support may also be fairly important for the Scripts to have. Nick _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
