On 12 Apr 2008, at 1:08 AM, Michael Homer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Kevin Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > It's in the %decls (Perl) hash, typed to an array - cabal_variables > and runhaskell should be listed there too.
They are. > Only the entries tied to a > particular set of recipe types are listed in $declarations, so things > like sandbox_options and environment=() that can be used anywhere > don't get a mention. Ok... just checking. > Actually, what is cabal_variables intended for? It's merged with > --prefix=, so should it really be cabal_options or is it used for > variables in the same way as make_variables? It doesn't really make > any difference to how they're entered or parsed, but we should make > sure the name is right before we're committed to preserving > compatibility with it. The use flag merging should happen with > whatever the default, most common way of adding configuration options > is. I was boilerplating from other recipes. I agree though, cabal_options is more apropo. Do you want another patch, or do you just want to do this yourself? -KQ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel