On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM, David Karell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > Why is this at all needed you may ask? Well, if at some time in the future > we'd like to have common patches for x86 processors, they should probably > look into either i686 or x86_64 directory (depending on 32-bit or 64-bit > architecture). So, this is all about future-proofing Scripts. > > If you think this is a really bad idea, you can always reach me on irc or, > of course, reply to this email. For the record, I still do think so, but I have been roundly shouted down, so carry on. The linked patch seems like a reasonable way of carrying that out, if we're willing to forgo ever having packages for i386 (and it seems unlikely to happen at this point).
The other cosmetic patch is fine too. -Michael _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
