Vladimir, It's not dead. The pulse is still there, and a motivated developer/sysadmin can make it sing again. Hisham and friends moved the ball a long way. Someone else can pick it up and keep Gobolinux going. The documents are there. It just takes effort.
The use case I see for Gobolinux is an organization that wants a sane filesystem hierarchy and doesn't want the viruses packaged for the mainstream Linux distributions. There is value in not being a big target. On Aug 21, 2013 3:21 PM, "Vladimir A. Pavlov" <p...@bk.ru> wrote: > Hi! > > What is the current status of GoboLinux? > > I see some recipe updates on the main page of gobolinux.org > but there are no newer isos/news/blog posts and the forum does > not seem to work (the latter can be an issue with my provider though). > > Is the project alive? I'd really like to try it but I wouldn't like to > spend > my time installing and learning it if it's coming to the end of the road. > > I guess there are people that upgrade recipes at least. What are > your plans for GoboLinux's future? I understand that ideal systems > does not need revolutions and just upgrading packages would be > just fine. But I see gcc-4.6.1 and glibc-2.15 as the latest package > versions at svn.gobolinux.org and those are too old for an alive > distro. Is there another place where the development continues today? > > Does it worth to try GoboLinux these days? > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-devel mailing list > gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel >
_______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
