Absolutely if it is god deleting the pid rather than what it appears like, mongrel never writing the pid, then it's not mongrel's problem. I haven't gotten around to replacing the mongrel cluster with thin or passenger yet, so I'll try the suggestion of mongrel_cluster's -- clean.
Thanks! Sean On Jan 9, 11:55 am, woahdae <[email protected]> wrote: > seems like this came up again in this thread: > > http://groups.google.com/group/god-rb/browse_thread/thread/0219271ab8... > > the solution mentioned above is to use mongrel_cluster for its --clean > option (more details in the other post). > > And as for blaming mongrel, I wouldn't be so sure. This only happens > for me when I use Gods clean option. I think God is the one that > deletes the pid rather than mongrel not writing one. Though I don't > have anything to back this up except a history of never experiencing > this with mongrel otherwise... > > On Dec 29 2008, 4:37 am, "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Aníbal, > > > Of course you are right... it is Mongrel's problem, not god's > > specifically. I was wondering how to configure god to accommodate the > > problem. I like both of your suggestions. I'll look into thin and if I > > don't want to go to thin I'll write a pkill guard. Thanks for the > > ideas. > > > Sean > > > On Dec 27, 10:24 am, "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sean, > > > > Actually your real problem is this weird mongrel behaviour. Not > > > sure what your application is, but in my case I have switched all my > > > production boxes to Thin without problem for a long time. > > > > If you want to stick to Mongrel, I think you can modify start, > > > stop or restart commands, depending how you have built them, to use a > > > pkill "guard" to assure the misbehaving process is always killed. > > > > Best regards, and Happy New Year > > > > ---------------------------------------- ---------------- > > > Aníbal Rojashttp://hasmanydevelopers.com(work)http://rubycorner.com > > > (community)http://anibal.rojas.com.ve (personal) > > > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:22 AM, [email protected] > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi fellows, > > > > > I have an issue that's happened quit a few times and I'm wondering > > > > what might be a better configuration to avoid this issue. > > > > > The problem is if one of the mongrels in a cluster starts up and has > > > > no pid file (I know this sounds odd, but it has happened quite a few > > > > times, I don't know why). So all of the mongrels in the cluster start > > > > up fine, but 1 ends up w/o a pid file. god comes along, finds no pid > > > > so tries to start the mongrel instance, it fails because the port is > > > > used and so no pid is written out, this happens over and over as god > > > > discovers the missing pid each time. The end result is that nothing is > > > > ever down, but I get emailed over and over by god saying it's trying > > > > to start one of the mongrels. Here is the relevant extract of my > > > > config: > > > > > w.start = "mongrel_rails start -c #{RAILS_ROOT} -p #{port} \ > > > > -P #{RAILS_ROOT}/tmp/pids/mongrel.#{port}.pid -e production -d" > > > > > # Conditions to start a mongrel > > > > w.start_if do |start| > > > > # If it's not running, start it > > > > start.condition(:process_running) do |c| > > > > c.running = false > > > > c.notify = {:contacts => ['developers'], :priority => > > > > 2, :category => 'god starting mongrel'} > > > > end > > > > end > > > > > What's a better way to configure mongrel start to avoid this problem? > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Sean --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "god.rb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/god-rb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
