On 8 Oct 2012, at 11:14, Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas.gazagna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Regarding the license for GODI description files: most of the description 
> files that packagers create in GODI are actually copied/pasted from author's 
> website, so I'm not sure how you'll be able to track this if you don't have a 
> *very* permissive licensing scheme. 

For this reason alone, anything other than a public domain license seems very 
questionable.  Are you really sure that all the contributors to GODI have the 
rights to relicense it under a Creative Commons license?

On the other hand, public domain is at least relatively simple.  I took a look 
at the FreeBSD and OpenBSD ports trees to get some inspiration, and OpenBSD 
appears to be public domain (or, at least, bsd.port.mk is), and FreeBSD is 
2-clause BSD licensed (but there are references to "source code" there which 
may not apply to textual description files).  Both of these repositories have a 
significant number of licenses cut&pasted from websites in their DESCR files.

Given that the goal of all these packaging systems is to make it easy for other 
people to get on with using OCaml, I would encourage dropping on the side of 
simplicity and making the description files public domain.

-anil
_______________________________________________
Godi-list mailing list
Godi-list@ocaml-programming.de
https://godirepo.camlcity.org/mailman/listinfo/godi-list

Reply via email to