Wow. You all are incredible -- your suggestion nailed it. Now I'm getting:

 ./peekgo 0x43c00000
mem[0]:0x3020100        mem[1]:0x7060504        mem[2]:0xb0a0908
mem[3]:0xf0e0d0c  ...

which is PERFECT. Thanks!


On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Dave Mazzoni <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestions. I'm a bit confused though since Mmap returns
> a
> > slice of bytes. I print all the bytes as you can see, but only the first
> > byte at each 32 bit boundary is correct. I don't know casting several of
> > them together would somehow derive the correct value.
>
> Because Mmap returns a []byte, every access using that []byte will
> load a single byte.  But device memory is often magic.  Doing a byte
> load and doing a word load are two very different things from the
> device's perspective.  So what we're suggesting is that you do
> something like
>     b := syscall.Mmap(...)
>     w := (*[1024]uint32)(unsafe.Pointer(&b[0]))
> and then print w[0].  That will access the memory as a 32-bit word, not a
> byte.
>
> Or conversely change your C program to print out one byte at a time
> and see what you get.
>
> Ian
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to