On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 1:06:46 PM UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:12:56 -0700 (PDT) > gordo...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > [...] > > The current beta will work not too badly with amd64 code but still > > doesn't use registers efficiently enough to support x86 code as it > > uses too many register. optimized C/C++ code only uses six or at > > most 7 registers, which the x86 architecture has, but not the nine > > registers that the above requires. > > > > So for this tight loop, golang is still slower than optimized C/C++ > > code, but not by very much if array bounds checks are disabled. > > It appears you're well versed in the x86 process instruction set and > code generation. Could you may be offer help to the folks working on > improving the code generation backend of the gc compiler? >
Will golang or google pay money for such a work? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
