On Friday, June 17, 2016 at 3:52:27 PM UTC+2, gordo...@gmail.com wrote: > > I don't see the point of the exercise other than it proves that not > putting the result of an operation back into the same register reduces the > latency slightly for your processor (whatever it is?); I suspect that if > you used any other register such as the unused AX register rather then the > R11 register, the results would be the same. >
Why do you see no point of the exercise and at the same time you do see the point of optimizing 1.7beta1 code? What is the difference? What would be interesting is to compare the run time on your processor with > the same eratspeed program written in golang using version 1.7beta1 with > and without array bounds checks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
