Personally I do that (despite that everyone advocates against it). Just
remember your struct should be just "struct{}" and nothing else. This
helped me to use shorter & cleaner names for my functions - actually it
converts a function pile to a batch of functions).
On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 at 7:37:35 PM UTC+4:30, atd...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> No it can have its uses.
>
> It really depends on what you are doing. However, I've never done this as
> a way to declare some kind of namespace.
>
> Typically, I use that in testing when I want a dummy type to implement an
> interface.
>
> That's just an example.
>
> It can be used also if you export the struct type. That allows to transfer
> a group of functions (closer to your idea of namespace).
> Instead of exporting each function separately.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
