On Saturday, 13 August 2016 00:57:10 UTC+1, simon place wrote: > > aren't your "pseudo-closure"'s commonly know as "objects"? > > In languages that have "objects" (and not the structs I'm using here that serve the same function) the answer is yes.
Of course this is already known eg https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=objects%20vs%20closures I was interested in specifics technical to golang. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
