On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 1:17:41 PM UTC+8, Jesse McNelis wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:11 PM, T L <tapi...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > If a programmer will call it anyway, she/he doesn't care efficiency. > What > > she/he cares is the convenience and cleanness. > > ppppppt.f() is surely cleaner than (*****ppppppt).f(), right? > > > > It shouldn't be convenient or look clean to do the wrong thing. > (*****ppppppt).f() should look horrible because it is horrible. >
rules should be broken for horrible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
