Inlining is conservative. As well as the size of the code being inlined, current 40 units (unit has not scale), some operations are not inlined, as they are considered hairy. switch used to be considered hairy, 1.7 fixed that, for is still hairy.
On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 15:58:30 UTC+10, Sokolov Yura wrote: > > But still question is interesting: why decision is based on source code > and not on instructions size? Both functions likely to produce same > assembler code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
