ok thanks - that seems to be them all I think the library would benefit from more 'obvious' , built in constant, or single parameterless function to generate these - more commonly as values to test output against, rather than inputs.
I'll put in that request and see if it gets picked up. Also curious as why the implementation is as math.NaN() rather than just math.NaN (function/method not constant). It doesn't seem to help with a potential interfaces. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
