On Sunday, 11 September 2016 14:25:29 UTC+1, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:06 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > Also curious as why the implementation is as math.NaN() rather than just > > math.NaN (function/method not constant). It doesn't seem to help with a > > potential interfaces. > > Go constants are untyped, more or less unlimited, and do not support > NaN or infinity or negative zero. There would be no simple way to > make math.NaN a constant. > > Ian >
Sorry my terminology error. I meant exported variable, not constant. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
